Some Fannish Ponderings...
Oct. 8th, 2009 08:47 amPoint the first: No, I'm not dead or have otherwise abandoned the 'net (or even gone off to reinvent myself somewhere else)
Point the second: I appear to be in the process of thoroughly gaining myself another fandom. Like I needed one of those. At least this time I can blame my brother. If he hadn't objected to the steady Discovery/History Channel/News/Sports diet (with the occasional Midsommer Murders, Taggart and Antiques Roadshow thrown in when relevant) I would never have started watching actual programmes again - and I certainly wouldn't have ended up here. *nods* Yep. This is definitely All His Fault.
So. CSI. Up until May, I'd seen two episodes (when staying at other people's houses for CBB related things) and I'd thought one of those (I'll come on to THAT in a moment) was the most ludicrous thing I'd ever seen. Then May happened and the bother insisted that we watch "normal television programmes like anyone else" and he found us an episode of Numb3rs to watch which was followed up by an episode of CSI. Given my past experience with the show, I nearly went off to do something else but was, frankly, too tired to move. So I watched it and spent most of the episode going "This is actually better than I remember, but BOY am I confused" (for anyone who knows CSI, the episode concerned was 'Mea Culpa' from the middle of season 5 which was SO not a good point to jump in!). After that it sort of became routine to catch an episode or two from time to time and then somewhere along the line it got to be a nightly thing...and yeah.
Through the wonders of repeats (honestly, throw a stone on the TV guide and you can find an episode of CSI!) and some boxsets, I've now seen pretty much the whole of CSI up to and including the end of season six. I've also seen bits of seasons seven and eight and quite a chunk of season nine, too, which is not bad going for only watching the show four and a half months! Naturally, I've accumulated a few thoughts on the show - some of which relate to what I've seen, some of which relate to what other people have said - which I'm going to put down in point form.
I guess the big thing is: WHAT THE HECK DO THE WRITERS HAVE AGAINST NICK STOKES?! I mean, granted, the stories they've got out of picking on him are (on the whole) some of the better episodes, but, really...I mean: Held at gun point, accused of murder, stalked (and tossed through a second floor window), swimming with a dead guy and buried alive, not to mention the back story. I don't think, at least to the end of season six, any other character's been beaten on (metaphorically speaking) quite so much. And the really fun part is that if you then dive into fandom, looking for stories about him, they almost invariably continue the theme!
One of the things I really like about the show is the sense of continuity - which is one reason why I did a huge "WTF?!" when one of the directors (in commentary) mentioned that he hated doing it and wanted to ignore past stuff. The mind boggles.
That said, there are one or two continuity issues which have me head-scratching. In "Fight Night" (s3) Nick is making a point to Grissom that he doesn't get to work solo despite having seniority over Warrick and Sara. It's a point that he reiterates in "Let the Seller Beware" (also s3) [nb possibly made here first and FN's the reiteration - I don't [yet] have the episode list memorised!]...which seems to ignore at least one episode from s2 (Anatomy of a Lye). Meanwhile, in the fandom, the s4 episode "Coming of Rage" is listed as his first solo case. Can't quite wrap my head around that one.
Speaking of "Let the Seller Beware", far be it for me to object to shirtless!Nick, but am I the only person who thinks there are better ways of checking a pool for a body than getting someone to dive in?
I don't know whether it's having sat through "Rendezvous" multiple times or what, but the more I see of Warrick the less I like him. That's not to say I hate the character, I think I just don't find him terribly interesting.
As much as I love the episode "Gum Drops" (s6), I do have to admit to a basic curiosity about what the episode would have been like with Grissom taking the lead on the case, partly because I just cannot see Grissom having the same conviction Cassie was alive that Nick has, which either means Grissom would have been wildly OOC or (assuming Nick was always intended to play some part in the episode) he and Nick were clashing over it - which would have been interesting to see.
It's particularly interesting to go back and see some of the earlier episodes (s1, especially) and see how far the characters have come - Brass is the one who arguably changed the most, which I think is just as well because s1 Brass is largely a cardboard-cutout-cop.
Some of the s1 costume choices, though... *giggles*
And MORE on s1: I caught "Boom" last night. I had seen it before, and it's definitely a better episode than I remember it being, but I'm puzzled: Why did no-one take Nick's statement? You'd think that's something that would have happened regardless. In fact there's actually quite a bit missing from the 'B' story which, considering how big the 'B' plot was, is a little disappointing. Can't help but think the 'A' and 'B' plots could have done with being switched. Would have given the episode a little more punch.
Come to think, the same applies to a s6 episode too. In "Daddy's Little Girl" the 'B' plot is the last installment of the "Grave Danger" arc, in that it wraps up Kelly Gordon's fate. (This, ironically enough, was the second CSI episode I ever saw - fortunately, the first episode I ever saw was the second half of "Grave Danger" so I did at least have a fighting chance of following it!) Meanwhile the 'A' plot featured a really twisted family group and a murderous cable guy. Guess which plot's actually the more interesting - and WAS the more interesting even when I didn't really understand a huge amount!
I'm amused by some of the early-fandom takes on Sara's background. To me, at least, it struck me as painfully obvious she'd come from some sort of bad domestic situation (s1's "Sex, Lies and Larvae", for example), which was eventually confirmed in s5 ("Nesting Dolls"). Yet the number of fanfics that pre-date s5 that give her a happy and loving childhood is mind boggling. Were these people watching the same show?! (NB not to say the stories are badly written; in general terms, they're not - which makes it all the stranger!)
Speaking of "are they watching the same show as me?", anyone who thought Sara was going to fall for anyone other than Grissom. Granted, I can fully understand why people don't necessarily think that relationship is a good idea, but that's where the writers were always going to go - assuming they went the romance route at all.
And speaking of GSR, just how bad does Sara's self-esteem have to be that she keeps coming back to the guy who keeps turning her down? I think I'd have moved on after the direct "No" in s3's "Playing With Fire"...
Going back to "Grave Danger", seeing the second half in splendid isolation, I really did think the whole premise was the stupidest thing I've ever encountered - and I still do! However, having now watched both halves, even as silly as I think the plot is, I have to admit that I do really enjoy them. Of course, it does rather take the tension out, knowing that everything works out in the end...
And that said, CSI really does seem to have a thing for people being buried alive. "Grave Danger" is (I think) the third such story over the first six seasons (two of them in s5!). Given how many more obscure ways to die they've managed, that does strike me as a little repetitive. (Of course, out of those three stories, only one of them was a fatality; the other two get rescued, so maybe it's not quite as bad as all that...)
And I'll leave my thoughts there for now - pretty sure I have more observations, but the boss has found me some work to do so I need to wrap up this post!
Point the second: I appear to be in the process of thoroughly gaining myself another fandom. Like I needed one of those. At least this time I can blame my brother. If he hadn't objected to the steady Discovery/History Channel/News/Sports diet (with the occasional Midsommer Murders, Taggart and Antiques Roadshow thrown in when relevant) I would never have started watching actual programmes again - and I certainly wouldn't have ended up here. *nods* Yep. This is definitely All His Fault.
So. CSI. Up until May, I'd seen two episodes (when staying at other people's houses for CBB related things) and I'd thought one of those (I'll come on to THAT in a moment) was the most ludicrous thing I'd ever seen. Then May happened and the bother insisted that we watch "normal television programmes like anyone else" and he found us an episode of Numb3rs to watch which was followed up by an episode of CSI. Given my past experience with the show, I nearly went off to do something else but was, frankly, too tired to move. So I watched it and spent most of the episode going "This is actually better than I remember, but BOY am I confused" (for anyone who knows CSI, the episode concerned was 'Mea Culpa' from the middle of season 5 which was SO not a good point to jump in!). After that it sort of became routine to catch an episode or two from time to time and then somewhere along the line it got to be a nightly thing...and yeah.
Through the wonders of repeats (honestly, throw a stone on the TV guide and you can find an episode of CSI!) and some boxsets, I've now seen pretty much the whole of CSI up to and including the end of season six. I've also seen bits of seasons seven and eight and quite a chunk of season nine, too, which is not bad going for only watching the show four and a half months! Naturally, I've accumulated a few thoughts on the show - some of which relate to what I've seen, some of which relate to what other people have said - which I'm going to put down in point form.
And I'll leave my thoughts there for now - pretty sure I have more observations, but the boss has found me some work to do so I need to wrap up this post!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 08:55 am (UTC)Have you written anything in this fandom yet? (I don't actually read a lot of fanfic, but if you were to post it on lj since I know CSI i'd be interested.)
Oh, and have you come across CSI Miami and CSI New York?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 09:40 am (UTC)I have a flypaper memory for the completely useless. Thus episode titles stick; how to code a website in a particular way doesn't...
I do also watch both Miami and New York - though I find Miami a little...trying. I really don't go a great deal on David Caruso's style of delivery and the cast just strike me as improbably gorgeous (even by Hollywood standards!). Do quite like New York, though - I just haven't seen quite as much of it as I have the original series.
As for fanfic *grins sheepishly* yes; I've begun a story which I'm posting over on fanfiction.net - so far, I've only got the prologue up, but the first full chapter's going up tomorrow and with a little luck, the rest of the story should go up over the next six/eight weeks. I don't know if I'm going to be posting it here on LJ, but I can give you the link to the ff.net story if you would like it?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 09:55 am (UTC)I really must get into browsxing ff-net.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 10:20 am (UTC)My author page is here:
http://www.fanfiction.net/~thefink
The story itself is here:
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5337164/1/Red_Rain
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 01:09 pm (UTC)Author page is here - just click on the final box to get to my faves. They are Danny/Lindsay, Calleigh and Sara focused, but often if you follow the authors you can find other pairings if you prefer:
http://www.fanfiction.net/u/1020191/
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 01:18 pm (UTC)Have always steered clear unless following a linked rec as I have heard there is a lot of dross, but am looking to widen what I read a bit.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 01:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 01:29 pm (UTC)Then on a different tack I'd also be interested in any ER fic, esp with Carter.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 01:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 09:30 am (UTC)Regarding Nick, I agree. Give Nicky a break, guys! I think it's in part due to acting style. There's no-one who can do trauma quite like George Eads and Jorja Fox, and they went down the 'traumatised by romance' route with Sara. Although I agree with you that her self-esteem has to be almost nil. Blame Hank in part for that as well as, y'know, incredibly crappy childhood. And I kinda like to think that Sara knew Grissom didn't really mean it when he said no all those times. I don't know how far you've got in S8, but there's an incredibly cute comment in episode 2, I think - Sara says to him how long have we been together, and Grissom says nine years. To me that just says everything about Grissom and how he views their relationship. (Yes, I am a GSR fan. Til the day I die...)
Also, re. 'Gum Drops' - having watched that episode a few days ago, I'm almost certain that the original script had Catherine in Nick's role and Grissom in Sara's. But there are no words to explain how much I love that ep, purely because it really gave both Nick and Sara (who, to be honest, I could have seen getting together in the early seasons) could have a chance to shine.
CSI rant... oops?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 10:19 am (UTC)I haven't seen the episode you're talking about in s8, but I have read about it and I can so picture Ecklie's expression *grin*
Hm - I'm not sure you're right about Catherine's role in "Gum Drops". Having listened to the commentary from the writer and director of the episode, I get the impression that the only person who got written out was Grissom (I'm pretty sure they say that Marg Helgenburger wasn't really available for the episode). The commentary also leaves me fairly sure that Grissom is the one who believes Cassie's alive (over the scene where Nick's watching the kids playing ball there's a discussion of how the Grissom scene was intended to work)...which does just leave me going "Huh?!" And yeah, the episode we got is just...it's about the most perfect CSI episode, in many ways. I think catching that was the episode that really hooked me (and persuaded me to buy s6 on DVD...)
Rant away; tis fun :)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 10:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 11:31 am (UTC)If you haven't seen it, the s6 episode "Rashomama" is hysterical.
I'm sort of working up to getting s7 and beyond - I'm still missing one or two of the earlier episodes (FiveUSA's repeat schedule is beyond crazy) so I'm sort of filling in the older stuff first.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 12:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 12:55 pm (UTC)If you want, I have the first half of s5 so we could do a temporary swap thing (I also have the second half of s6 - but if you've already got it en-route from Amazon, there's no guarentee my copy would arrive any faster!)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 01:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 01:33 pm (UTC)Then again, I think if I'd been Ecklie, the way the team was split isn't how I'd have split it. I mean, if the whole point was to get to Grissom, why did Ecklie leave Sara on Grissom's shift? And also, what happened to the rest of the old swing shift? Questions, always questions - and the last thing I need RIGHT at this minute is another plot bunny!
I'll pop my address into an email in a moment.
I may take you up on the offer of CSI:NY at a later date - although, oddly FiveUSA seems to be showing THAT rather more consistantly than they ever manage with the original, so I'm actually doing pretty well on getting caught up and in the right order there *grin* I *do* watch Miami, but mostly because it beats trying to find something else. There's just something about it that I don't like.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 10:06 am (UTC)I agree with pretty much everything you said, although I'm mostly at a loss as far as episode titles are concerned. *glares at SkyTV* (Btw, please check out CSI Files; IMO, one of THE best info pages on any fandom!)
Two things I wish they had expanded on -- Lady Heather (I LOVED her dynamic with Grissom!) and Greg Sanders. I mean, it's cool and all that he's left the lab and is now a full CSI, but did he have to leave his cute geekiness behind in the process?!?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 10:31 am (UTC)Point taken on Greg - though, to be fair, there was the whole "Fannysmackin'" storyline in s7 which is probably where it really got lost. Certainly up to the end of s6 he was still pretty geeky.
As for the author alert, I have no explanation, but the link to the story is here:
http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5337164/1/Red_Rain
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 10:44 am (UTC)I kinda liked the whole "Fannysmackin'" arc, and the more serious Greg evolving from it, but they could've done that and still kept at least some of his geekiness, IMO. Hmph. :) Guess I'll have to make do with Hodges now ... I absolutely adore the in-lab episodes where he gets to be the focus! (Have you seen the s9 episode yet that's pretty much "Galaxy Quest", CSI style? One of my all-time favorites, EVAR!)
Oh, and thanks for the link! *goes off to read*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 11:40 am (UTC)I'm lucky in that mum is quite into police procedural shows, so as long as I don't demand to watch too many episodes she's already seen (she has an objection to that - and I have to admit, to a degree, I'm with her on that; there are definitely some episodes that don't bear repeating too many times), I'm OK to watch on the TV rather than being consigned to the computer or the DVD player.
yvw - as I said further up-thread, the first main chapter should be going up tomorrow (unless I can manage to get it up later this afternoon - but probably tomorrow) and I'm aiming to get it finished over the next six/eight weeks.
Assuming I can stop spawning plot bunnies for further along the timeline *sigh*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-09 08:49 am (UTC)What's funny is that the husband never stuck around to watch CSI/CSI Miami when it was first-run, but will watch the reruns on FiveUS nowadays. Go figure. It's just lucky that we (sort of) share an interest in the same procedurals (CSI, Law & Order, Criminal Minds, NCIS -- and JAG, when it was still on), so when I am recording shows, it's not too much of a hardship for him. *wishes for a SKY+ receiver*
Well, I checked the prologue of your CSI fic, and I'd already read it -- just now got the alert that you've updated, too. :) Guess it just was a bit too long ago ...
Good luck with the plot bunnies. I'm battling several from both Star Trek and Harry Potter!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-19 07:33 pm (UTC)*joins you in wishing for a SKY+ receiver*
(no subject)
Date: 2009-11-19 07:58 pm (UTC)Somebody's coming by to (hopefully) fix the problem tomorrow.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 12:30 pm (UTC)Seemed like every other episode he was being held at gun point, kidnapped, buried alive, had a psychotic stalker, fell for the way wrong girl, etc.
Always felt sorry for him
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-08 12:50 pm (UTC)